Thank you, President Bush for
your Eid greetings, we are indeed greatly indebted. And thank you for telling
us, one more time, that your new war is not against Islam and Muslims. It was
time that you reminded us that we should not take the B-52 bombers showering
bombs on our cities so personally. Indeed, the six Iraqis who died on the first
day of December are not to be counted among the dead; they were illegal
combatants, working in an oil factory.
As Muslims, we are grateful to
you for all the food packages that were sent down from the Afghan skies during
the last year. Had we been the children of Israel, it would have reminded us of
our great past when Manna and Salva was sent down by God. Let me assure you, Mr.
President, American peanut butter tastes so good that our Afghan children became
so keen to pick up the food packages that they could not even distinguish
between the food packages and thousands of canister bombs that your B-52 bombers
left behind in their wasteland. But, of course, it was their bad luck; we will
just add them to the list of collateral damage. That way, we will not have to go
through the tedious ritual of calculating the number of dead.
I am sorry to hear that things
are not going well back home. Some unpatriotic Americans have started to ask
questions about your war of terror, excuse me, war on terror. They ask for
results for the 40 billion dollars you so graciously and hurriedly sanctioned
for the great war. That little audio cassette that recently surfaced at the Al-Jazeera
did not help much, I suppose. Although you have the Al-Jazeera's Kabul
correspondent firmly locked up in a cage at camp X-ray (and thank God, the
international union of journalists has not made a peep about him), this little
island of a network keeps coming up with trouble after trouble.
You were, however, more
successful with Herta Daeubler-Gmelin, the German Justice Minister who so rudely
compared your new war policies to that of Adolf Hitler; thank goodness, she was
quickly sacked by Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder for poisoning the relations. I
must also congratulate you on quickly getting rid of Mme. Francoise Ducros, the
Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien's Director of Communications, who so
ungratefully called you a moron despite all the soft lumber that American
companies so cheaply buy from Canada in order to help their economy.
Mr. President, it is heartening
to know that the new Department of Homeland Security is finally off to a grand
start. With an operational budget of $37.5 billion and nearly 170,000 federal
employees, it should keep the homeland secure. Just let no American walk out of
your great country without the protection of pilot-less drones for streets of
the world have become very dangerous for them.
I hope that with your
ambassador in London so ardently standing behind you in your war after war, it
should not be difficult to soon control all the unruly streets. Whatever
happened the other day in Amman should never be allowed to happen again. I think
it would not be a bad idea to send a little congratulatory note to your distant
relative in Amman for taking care of the matter so promptly. I hear the little
town of Mann is also grateful to you for bringing all the world attention to
this tribal region. The price those little rabbles had to pay was not much, I
suppose, compared to what the Afghans have paid. It was merely a double digit
number that they lost. But we will not call it war against Muslims; after all,
it was their own king whose army was doing the job.
Mr. President, in your Eid
greetings, you have rightly told us that the new year is full of promises. We
look forward to the new ventures. Afghanistan is indeed becoming a little too
dull and although great news is in store regarding Iraq, Hans Blix and his team
of inspectors are taking too long. Please hurry up or else the current rating
will start to go down and you know very well how difficult it is to whip up the
hysteria once it has subsided.
You know that anthrax cannot be
used again to create fear. (By the way, the little leak leading to the US
military was plugged very well and I sincerely hope that all patriotic Americans
will remember never to ask any questions about anthrax.) So, what are we going
to do next time? How would you generate new waves of fear? I suppose those
little Napoleons in thousands of homeland security offices would come up with
something. Perhaps, you should ask them to start cooking something like the
danger of a bio-engineered mosquito bringing a deadly virus. That would be
something!
It is my sincere hope, Mr
President, that in the new year, you will not be so lenient with men who keep
bothering you with their silly questions about Afghanistan. I was shocked to
read a report by one Robert Fisk who sketched a graphic picture of little
children being blown up in the deserts of Khost. He also had the nerve to draw
world attention to the endless queue of mutilated civilians sitting outside the
hospital in Herat, hoping to get an artificial leg. Likewise, people who keep
mentioning international laws, protocols and agreements should be stopped from
reminding the world that in your war of terror (excuse my slip again, Mr.
President), you have not even spared ambassadors. No one has the right to remind
the world that Ambassador Mullah Zaeef is still locked up in a cage in Camp
X-ray.
I am glad to know that early in
2003, Germans will take charge of the Afghan ordeal. It would be their boys who
would risk their lives for this grand show which, we all know, will only last
for as long as money keeps coming. But I am afraid, Afghans are rather notorious
for their tenacity. There is little hope that what the Soviet Union could not
achieve with 140,000 men, we can achieve without large-scale disasters soon
erupting all over this unruly land. Those who keep saying that the Afghan
adventure is headed for disaster should all be locked up with the "illegal
combatants". (By the way, that was an excellent invention for which its
inventor should be amply rewarded.)
That reminds me to say that
events like the appearance of those four pictures of C-130 planes carrying their
human cargo to Camp X-ray should not be allowed to happen again. They do bring
the specter of war crimes being launched in some court, somewhere in the world
although you have rightly declined to sign the international charter which would
put the American soldiers in risk. But the images of those shackled men, which
recently flashed on millions of computer screens around the world, was not nice,
to say the least.
I am also sad to know that some
Edward
Saids are still around. They keep talking about an impossible linkage: the
suffering of Palestinians, so carefully crafted by a 2.1 billion dollar annual
aid to Israel and numerous supplements. They have maps, numbers and pictures
which they keep showing to the world. The appearance of a new great wall here,
barbed fences there, burned olive orchards, destroyed homes, pieces of dead
bodies scattered on streets, made-in-America gun ships and helicopters bombing
the refugee camps. Of course, your war is not against Muslims and certainly
there is no link between the suffering of Palestinians and the catastrophes
Americans continue to experience abroad. No, the world should accept the verdict
of your "man of peace" who looks forward to his new term which will
complete the task of fortification of Israel.
And finally, let me close by
thanking you, once again, Mr. President, for the opportunity you so graciously
provided to some of our Muslim brothers and sisters to come and visit you and
Laura at the White House at the beginning of the month of Ramadan. That great
occasion will always be remembered by them and their children and their
children. They are eternally grateful to you and Laura. I am sure you also value
their friendship because they the harbingers of an intellectual northern
alliance you so desperately need at this time. With all the best wishes for your
new year adventures I am, yours sincerely.
Dr Muzaffar Iqbal is a freelance
writer
Ads by Google:
Advertisements not controlled by IslamiCity
|
muzaffar_i@hotmail.com